Archive for the 'Diversity on the Bench' Category
“We need judges who are from all parts of society,” Justice Garman told the McLean County League of Women Voters, according to The (Bloomington) Pantagraph. It is important for people who enter the courtroom to see judges of diverse backgrounds, she said. ”The justice system must not only be fair but be perceived to be fair,” Justice Garman said.
To learn about Justice at Stake’s work to increase diversity on the bench, see the JAS web page about this issue.No comments
Justice at Stake was among more than 30 organizations writing a letter that urges U.S. senators to consider professional diversity when considering judicial candidates.
The letter contending that a greater diversity of professional backgrounds is needed on the federal courts was signed by labor, civil rights and good government groups, Federal Times reported. The letter stated in part:
“A truly diverse judiciary … not only reflects the gender, ethnic, sexual orientation, disability, and racial diversity of the nation, but also includes judges who come from all corners of the legal profession — and particularly those who have worked in the public interest, representing those whose voices are otherwise rarely heard. This sort of professional diversity both enhances judicial decisionmaking and is essential to the public’s trust in our justice system. Read more
Republican U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has given a green light for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a confirmation hearing on President Obama’s nomination of Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Darrin P. Gayles for a federal district court seat in Florida.
If confirmed, Judge Gayles would become the first openly gay African-American man to serve on the federal courts. According to a Huffington Post article, by signaling his consent, Rubio “has removed the biggest obstacle to Gayles’ confirmation.” Last year, Rubio effectively blocked advancement of Obama’s nomination of another judge who, if confirmed, would have held the same groundbreaking status. Read moreNo comments
With some analysts saying it will be difficult for Democrats to retain control of the Senate in November, examination of President Obama’s impact on the federal courts already has begun.
A NPR report suggests the president has shied from pushing overtly ideological nominees for federal judgeships, while building a strong record for diversity on the bench.
“If present trends continue, he will have appointed more African-Americans than any other president, more Hispanics than any other president, more women than any other president and many more Asian-Americans,” said Russell Wheeler of the Brookings Institution. Read moreNo comments
When the terms of dozens of judicial nominating commission members expire this summer, Florida Gov. Rick Scott will have a chance to fill the seats and prove that he cares about making Florida’s courts better reflect the state’s population diversity, an Orlando Sentinel editorial says.
The editorial elaborates on why this is an important issue:
“Public trust in the judicial system, and the quality of the justice it delivers, are at risk when the courts don’t come close to reflecting their communities.” Read more
U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, “needs to stop stonewalling” and allow the nomination of a federal district court nominee in his state to proceed in the Senate, a Greenville Daily Reflector op-ed says.
Federal prosecutor Jennifer May-Parker, if confirmed, would be the first African-American judge to sit on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. She would fill a judgeship that has not had an occupant since 2005 and now claims the longest-running vacancy in the nation. Burr has declined to say why he has refused to consent to the Senate Judiciary Committee proceeding to hold a hearing on the nomination of May-Parker, whom he once endorsed (see Gavel Grab). Read moreNo comments
Leslie Abrams, a federal prosecutor, would become the first African-American female to serve on a federal court in Georgia if the Senate confirms a nomination announced this week by President Obama.
While the nomination drew praise from Democratic U.S. Rep. David Scott, he did not back down on his high-profile criticism of another Obama nominee for the federal court in Georgia, Michael Boggs, and neither did the NARAL Pro-Choice America group, the Huffington Post reported. To learn more about controversy over the Boggs nomination, see Gavel Grab.
Meanwhile, Staci Michelle Yandle, nominated for the U.S. District Court in Illinois, “sailed through her confirmation hearing” before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, according to the Washington Blade. Yandle would become the first African-American lesbian federal judge in two decades if confirmed.No comments
Greater diversity is needed on the state courts in Florida, a Tallahassee Democrat editorial says, and to achieve that, “more lawyers must step forward” to apply to serve.
Florida Bar President Eugene Pettis recently established a task force to help increase diversity on the state bench and on commissions that screen qualified judicial candidates for possible appointment by the governor. The task force also will examine why diverse candidates are not applying for these posts (see Gavel Grab).
Lawyer Lisa Bond Edwards, a member of the task force and a screening panel member, offered one explanation for the shortage of applications from diverse candidates. Some potential candidates with whom she talked said that after seeing list of applicants rejected by the governor, they asked, “Why should I waste my time?” For background about the governor’s appointments, see Gavel Grab.
Meanwhile a WFSU report was entitled, “Florida Bar Task Force Examines ‘Concerning’ Minority Judge Numbers.”No comments
In an interview with KQED Public Radio in California, the dean of the U.C. Davis Law School suggested there is improvement in diversity on the state’s courts overall, but a large gap remains between the state’s population of Hispanics and its judges who are Latino.
“We’re talking a situation today where basically 60 percent of K-12 students are Latino, and less than 10 percent of the trial court judges are Latino. When justice appears to be meted out by unrepresentative judges, I think that there’s a concern about the legitimacy of the results and the possible racial injustice of it all,” said Kevin R. Johnson (photo). He is the first Latino head of a University of California law school.
Johnson also noted the absence of a Latino or an African-American justice on the state Supreme Court, and a margin of 2-1 males to females on the Court of Appeals and the trial courts. Johnson said a diverse appeals court can help lead to better judicial decision-making by “bringing together a variety of perspectives, a variety of thoughts, a variety of ways of looking at the world.”No comments
Former Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor delivered some compelling statistics about the lack of diversity on the bench, nationally and locally, according to a blog submission in AZ Attorney.
“Diverse experiences can be used in appropriate circumstances to better understand the case at hand. The presence of diverse voices broadens discussion and analysis,” Justice McGregor told the audience at the kickoff event co-sponsored by Justice at Stake.No comments