Archive for the 'Judicial misconduct' Category
The findings of an investigation into the conduct of then-Judge Richard Cebull, who forwarded a racist and sexist email about President Obama from his courthouse computer (see Gavel Grab) and who retired this month, remain secret.
An Associated Press article said a Judicial Council order issued in the investigation on March 15 is moot, given the U.S. District judge’s retirement on May 3, according to a new order by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Judicial Council has released neither the order nor the findings of its investigation. When the the Judicial Council meets June 28, it will consider revisions to the order and the memorandum, and it was uncertain whether they would ultimately be made public, the AP said.
Judge Cebull sat in Montana. He apologized to the president after the email was made public.No comments
The judge who sentenced ex-Justice Joan Orie Melvin of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court this week has set a resentencing hearing for Tuesday, but he signaled it will deal only with a legal technicality.
Common Pleas Court Judge Lester Nauhaus said he will sentence Orie Melvin to three consecutive one-year terms of house arrest, as opposed to three years of house arrest, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. “There is absolutely no difference in those sentences,” he said. “It is absolutely form over substance.”
The ex-justice was convicted of corruption in the conduct of her two campaigns for the high court. This week, her sentence included an order to have her photograph taken in handcuffs, and sign copies with apologies to all her former fellow judges. There was controversy over her sentencing (see Gavel Grab).No comments
A judge’s order that convicted ex-Justice Joan Orie Melvin of Pennsylvania write an apology to all of her former fellow state jurists, with a photograph of her in handcuffs (see Gavel Grab), is sparking controversy.
A Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article was headlined, “Experts say judge’s ‘shaming’ order for Orie Melvin may not be enforceable/Legal experts raise constitutional issues.”
Despite her conviction on corruption counts, Orie Melvin proclaims her innocence. Law professor Jules Epstein of Wilder University said, “Even when you are convicted of a crime, you retain your Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. You can’t be punished for refusing to exercise it.”
In the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, columnist Eric Heyl mocked those who consider the sentencing too harsh — Orie Melvin also was sentenced to three years in house arrest, and a $55,000 fine — in a commentary entitled, “Wow, judge! Show mercy on Melvin.” Read moreNo comments
Former Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin, convicted by a jury of criminal corruption in connection with two Supreme Court campaigns, was sentenced on Tuesday to three years of house arrest and two years of probation.
In addition, ex-Justice Melvin was fined $55,000 by Common Pleas Judge Lester G. Nauhaus for the illegal use of her state workers during the campaigns, according to a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article.
“I don’t believe that Joan Melvin is an evil person but I do believe that her arrogance is stunning,” Judge Nauhaus said, according to a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette report. As part of his sentencing Melvin, he ordered that she send handwritten apologies to all judges in the state.
The former judge’s sister, Janine Orie, was sentenced to a year of house arrest and two years of probation for her convictions in the case. She worked on Melvin’s staff.
The jurist’s conviction by a jury over campaign corruption has sparked high-profile calls for Pennsylvania to switch to a merit-based selection system for picking judges, an option endorsed recently by four former Pennsylvania governors (see Gavel Grab). Justice at Stake, meanwhile, said merit selection has a “real chance” of winning support in Pennsylvania.No comments
On Friday, Louisiana’s Judicial Campaign Oversight Committee declared that Jefferson Parish judicial candidate Hilary Landry violated the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct.
The panel stated that Landry’s campaign flier contained a misleading claim about a case involving her opponent, Scott Schlegel, the Associated Press reports.
Landry’s campaign lawyer, Tom Owen, defended the flier under Landry’s First Amendment right to criticize Schlegel.
Schlegel and Landry went head to head in a runoff election on Saturday. According to WWL-TV News, Schlegel won 67 percent of the vote, and Landry received 33 percent.
WWWL-TV political analyst Clancy DuBos said that Landry was expected to win in an earlier primary, and “she ran second and it wasn’t that close. So when you’re second and you have a lot of money, you need to go on the attack.No comments
The Associated Press reports that retired New Mexico District Judge Michael Murphy who was accused of four felony counts in 2011, including bribery, pleaded no contest last week to misdemeanor misconduct charges.
Murphy was previously indicted on charges that he gave $4,000 to former Gov. Bill Richardson to win appointment to the state bench (see Gavel Grab).
The article says Murphy’s case shocked the judiciary two years ago, and Richardson called the accusations of funneling money from judicial candidates “outrageous and defamatory.”
Murphy entered a plea deal that dismissed the four felony charges, the article says.No comments
Rather than face incarceration, suspended Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin’s lawyers argued this week that she should receive a sentence of probation instead.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Melvin will be sentenced May 7. She was convicted earlier this year on criminal corruption charges (see Gavel Grab). Her sister, Janine Orie, was convicted of similar charges as well.
In arguing for probation, Melvin’s attorney Patrick Casey wrote that she is a family-oriented individual, with a life dedicated to public service. Read moreNo comments
Senior Federal District Judge Richard Cebull, a Montanan who apologized for forwarding a racist and sexist e-mail about President Obama, has submitted a letter stating he will retire fully from the bench on May 3, according to Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Alex Kozinski.
A special committee investigated both a complaint that Judge Cebull filed against himself and another, and submitted its report to the Judicial Council in December 2012, according to a statement by Judge Kozinski.
The Judicial Council issued an order and memorandum March 15. They are to be confidential during an appeal period, Judge Kozinski wrote.No comments
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin submitted her resignation on Monday. The justice, who was suspended earlier from the court, was convicted by a jury last month of public corruption charges arising from two Supreme Court campaigns.
Justice Melvin said she intends to pursue an appeal of her conviction. “In the meantime, however, the citizens of Pennsylvania deserve a fully-staffed Supreme Court,” she wrote in her resignation letter, according to a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article.
She was facing possible impeachment proceedings in the Pennsylvania House. Her resignation is to become effective May 1.
Following her conviction, calls have risen for Pennsylvania to switch from partisan elections to an appointive selection system for choosing judges. To learn about four former governors endorsing the appointive path, see Gavel Grab.No comments
A new round of calls for Pennsylvania to adopt merit-based selection of appeals court judges surfaced after a jury convicted state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin and her sister, Jane Orie, of corruption charges on Thursday (see Gavel Grab).
“Time to put merit selection of judges on the fast track,” declared the headline for a Philadelphia Daily News editorial. It decried the state of judicial elections in Pennsylvania:
“On one level, Orie’s Melvin’s misconduct should come as no shock in a state where the election of judges turns a process that should ensure the most impartial, fair and qualified justice into a money circus. Such elections force judicial candidates to raise money – from lawyers and others who might ultimately appear before them.
“And as a recent report from the Brennan Center for Justice points out, the ability for special interests to bankroll judicial campaigns is a further chilling indictment of a terrible system. The Brennan report, incidentally, identified Michigan and Pennsylvania as the two costliest states for recent judicial candidates. Orie Melvin and losing candidate Jack Panella raised a combined $5.4 million in their 2009 election.”