Gavel Grab

Archive for March, 2010

USA Today Cites JAS, Says Reform Efforts 'Growing'

The lead front-page story in today’s USA Today,  ”States act to revise judicial selection,” focuses on efforts to protect elected courts from special-interest money, and includes quotes and data from Justice at Stake and the Brennan Center for Justice.

Noting recent reform efforts in West Virginia, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada and Minnesota, reporter Fredreka Schouten wrote:

A growing number of states are rewriting their rules on selecting judges to curb the influence of special interests on judicial contests.

Thirty-nine states elect at least some of their judges, and judicial candidates for high courts raised $206.4 million for campaigns from 2000 through 2009, according to Justice at Stake, a non-partisan coalition that promotes impartial courts. That’s up from $83.3 million the previous decade.

Outside interests spent another $39.3 million on TV ads in judicial elections in the past 10 years, the group’s data show.

“It makes it look like justice is for sale,” said Ciara Torres-Spelliscy of The Brennan Center for Justice, which has pushed for changes in judicial elections.

The article also discusses the impact of Citizens United on reform efforts, quoting JAS Executive Director Bert Brandenburg, as saying that the controversial ruling, which allows corporations and unions to spend without limit on elections, “has given a lot of extra energy to reform efforts.”

The full USA Today story is here. To learn more, click on Gavel Grab stories about campaign finance laws, recusal reform, and judicial selection reform, or this JAS press release, hailing “national momentum” for court reforms. Or see Justice at Stake’s “Your State” national map.

No comments

Wednesday Media Summary

JUSTICE AT STAKE

USA Today: Fundraising for states’ high-court races
Fredreka Schouten – 3/30/2010

Legal Newsline: Group may challenge publicly financed elections in West Virginia
John O’Brien – 3/30/2010

NATIONAL SECURITY/COURTS

Chicago Sun Times: Government must reveal more evidence against taxi driver accused of supporting al-Qaida
NATASHA KORECKI – 3/30/2010

Washington Post/AP: Judge seeks more answers on alleged CIA misconduct
DEVLIN BARRETT – 3/30/2010

CNN: Judge approves settlement in ‘state secrets’ case
Terry Frieden – 3/31/2010

Detroit News: Last Hutaree militia suspect arraigned in federal court
Mike Wilkinson – 3/30/2010

CITIZENS UNITED/CAMPAIGN FINANCE

Jurist/Hotline Buzz: SpeechNow decision lessens imbalance between wealthy interests and small donors
Stephen M. Hoersting – 3/30/2010

The Daily Caller: Another victory for free speech
Paul Sherman – 3/30/2010

Constitutional Law Prof Blog: The Reach of Citizens United
Steven D. Schwinn – 3/30/2010

Truthout: Citizens United Against Citizens United
David Swanson – 3/30/2010
Read more…

No comments

Tuesday Media Summary

NATIONAL SECURITY/COURTS

NY Times: Militia Charged With Plotting to Murder Officers
NICK BUNKLEY and CHARLIE SAVAGE – 3/30/2010

Detroit News: Hutaree militia planned to kill law officer, attack the funeral procession
Paul Egan and Mike Wilkinson – 3/29/2010

Main Justice: Waiting on the Trial of the Century
Joe Palazzolo – 3/29/2010

FOX News: More Guantanamo Detainees Are Returning to Terror Upon Release
Diane Macedo – 3/29/2010

Main Justice: Detainee Cases Expose Divisions on Counterterrorism Policy
Joe Palazzolo – 3/29/2010

Huffington Post: Liz Cheney, It’s Your Father’s Fault
Scott Payne – 3/29/2010

FrumForum: Unlocking Gitmo and Throwing Away the Key
Elise Cooper – 3/29/2010

CITIZENS UNITED/CAMPAIGN FINANCE

Investor’s Business Daily: Dems’ Next Target: The Supreme Court And Corporate Cash
SEAN HIGGINS – 3/29/2010

Business Insider: Post-Citizens United, Courts Begin Reshaping Campaign Funding Law
Erin Geiger Smith – 3/29/2010

FOX News: Money Has the Right to Talk
Hans von Spakovsky and Robert Gordon, Jr. – 3/29/2010

AllGov: Court Ruling Opens Doors to Unlimited Campaign Donations
Noel Brinkerhoff, David Wallechinsky – 3/29/2010

Judges On Merit: Justice Brought to You By Your Corporate Sponsors
Susan – 3/29/2010

HEALTHCARE REFORM/COURTS

Columbus Dispatch: Ohio won’t join states’ suit over health reform
James Nash – 3/30/2010

Read more…

No comments

W. Va. Law May Face Suit; AP Cites Justice at Stake

Opponents of campaign finance laws are rattling their legal sabers in West Virginia, suggesting in an Associated Press article that they may sue to overturn the state’s new public-financing law for state Supreme Court candidates. A similar challenge is being mounted against a Wisconsin’s law enacted last year.

The West Virginia law provides up to $550,000 to candidates who participate in the voluntary program, with additional “rescue” money available if a candidate’s opponents exceed a certain spending level.

The law was passed in part because of public revulsion over the state’s 2004 Supreme Court election, in which a coal executive spent $3 million to elect a new justice while his company appealed a $50 million jury award. According to the Center for Competitive Politics, public financing discriminates against candidates who choose not to take part, although the article doesn’t make clear exactly how.

As noted by Charles Hall, a Justice at Stake spokesman quoted in the article, a similar public financing law in North Carolina was unanimously upheld by the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also oversees West Virginia. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal  that used similar grounds to those being cited by the Center for Competitive Politics.

“They’re trying to take a limited set of circumstances, and stretch it into a broad principle that overturns more than 30 years of federal court rulings,” Hall said. “They are a long way from the finish line.”

For the full article, click here. To learn more about public finance measures in West Virginia and Wisconsin, click here. To see a poll showing strong public support in West Virginia for public financing of Supreme Court elections,  click here.

No comments

Monday Media Summary

JUSTICE AT STAKE

Charleston Gazette/AP: Election legislation could attract lawsuits
Lawrence Messina – 3/28/2010

CAMPAIGN FINANCE/COURTS

Washington Post: Court strikes down campaign contribution limits
James Vicini – 3/26/2010

NY Times: Courts Take On Campaign Finance Decision
ADAM LIPTAK – 3/27/2010

Washington Post: Ruling allows contributions to activist groups for campaigns
Dan Eggen – 3/27/2010

Wall Street Journal: Free Speech, the Sequel
3/27/2010

SCOTUSBlog: Widening impact of Citizens United
Lyle Denniston – 3/26/2010

SCOTUS Blog: “Soft money” donation ban upheld
Lyle Denniston – 3/26/2010

Blog of Legal Times: Citing Precedent, Panel Upholds Soft-Money Ban
David Ingram – 3/26/2010

Reason: ‘The First Amendment Cannot Be Encroached Upon for Naught’
Jacob Sullum – 3/26/2010

Cato @ Liberty: Citizens United Goes to Work
Roger Pilon & John Samples – 3/26/2010

Houston Chronicle: The first trickle
Editorial – 3/27/2010

Bloomberg: Chicago Taxi Driver Accused of Providing Support to Al-Qaeda
Andrew Harris – 3/27/2010

Read more…

No comments

Is a Supreme Confrontation Near?

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens hasn’t announced whether he will retire this year.

But that doesn’t matter in Washington, where an expected announcement has the White House, activists and the Senate “bracing for an election-year confrontation over the future of the Supreme Court,” according to a New York Times article. It went on to list names that have been mentioned (see Gavel Grab) as potentially on a short list of candidates.

The next high court nomination opportunity for President Obama will play out in a changed political setting from his last.

If Justice Stevens retires, the New York Times reported, his replacement “could secure the seat for the liberal faction for years. But not all liberals are alike. The president’s base hopes he will name a full-throated champion to counter Justice Antonin Scalia, the most forceful conservative on the bench.”

Given the president’s recent victory on health-care legislation, some advocates are hoping Obama will seize political momentum and take on picking a strong counterbalance to Justice Scalia.

No comments

Campaign Contribution Limits Shot Down

A federal appeals court ruled Friday that an independent political group can collect unlimited individual donations to spend on advertising for or against political candidates.

The ruling, following the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, went further to loosen campaign finance restrictions.

The conservative group SpeechNow won a unanimous ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that “essentially expanded the bounds” of Citizens United, according to The Blog of Legal Times. Citizens United held that corporations can spend freely on political advertising.

At issue were limits of up to $5,000 a year placed on individual contributions to independent political advocacy groups such as SpeechNow. The court’s chief judge said the limits violated the First Amendment, Reuters reported.

“The SpeechNow ruling significantly broadens the impact of Citizens United, extending its constitutional reasoning from campaign spending to campaign donations,” wrote SCOTUSblog.

The latest ruling “represents a further weakening of campaign-finance laws and limits,” stated the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog. Read more

No comments

KY Judge, Father Agree to Fines

In Kentucky, a father’s financial aid helped his daughter win election as a judge. Now each has agreed to pay a $15,000 fine to settle a campaign-finance case against them.

Louisville Metro Council member Jim King gave Katie King $135,000 during her successful campaign for a judgeship in 2008, the Louisville Courier-Journal reported. The state Registry of Election Finance found that the gifts violated campaign-finance laws. Learn more about the case from Gavel Grab. Jim King is running for mayor of Louisville.

No comments

Senate Panel Backs MN Reform Proposal

A committee in the Minnesota Senate has approved a bill asking voters if they want to change how state judges are selected.

A bipartisan group of reformers is supporting a proposed  constitutional amendment to replace partisan elections with up-or-down retention elections and to set up a non-partisan commission to evaluate judges near the ends of their terms.

Supporters want to shield judges from special-interest money and politics, according to a Minnesota Public Radio report. Others think the current system is working. To learn more about the Minnesota proposal, check out Gavel Grab. A Justice at Stake issues page has more information about appointment and retention systems.

No comments

Bopp Expands Legal Team in Far-Reaching Effort

Indiana-based lawyer James Bopp Jr.,  working nationwide to dismantle campaign finance regulation, is familiar to Gavel Grab readers (see earlier posts here.) Now an update on Bopp from the Washington Post provides details about his reach.

The lawyer who played a central role in framing the case that led to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has increased his team of lawyers to 15 and now has 27 cases in play in courts around the country.

Citizens United is going to have a very substantial impact,” Bopp told the Post. “Obviously, we’re encouraged that we’re on the road back to restoring the First Amendment application to campaign finance.”

Bopp is vice chairman of the Republican National Committee. His legal team is keeping tabs on efforts by states and Congress to respond to Citizens United, which allows corporations and labor unions to spend freely on independent advertising to support or oppose political candidates. Read more

No comments

Next Page »